首页> 外文OA文献 >'They would never receive you without a husband' : Paradoxical barriers to antenatal care scale-up in Rwanda
【2h】

'They would never receive you without a husband' : Paradoxical barriers to antenatal care scale-up in Rwanda

机译:“如果没有丈夫,他们将永远收不到你”:卢旺达扩大产前保健的悖论障碍

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: to explore perspectives and experiences of antenatal care and partner involvement among women who nearly died during pregnancy ('near-miss'). DESIGN: a study guided by naturalistic inquiry was conducted, and included extended in-community participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussions. Qualitative data were collected between March 2013 and April 2014 in Kigali, Rwanda. FINDINGS: all informants were aware of the recommendations of male involvement for HIV-testing at the first antenatal care visit. However, this recommendation was seen as a clear link in the chain of delays and led to severe consequences, especially for women without engaged partners. The overall quality of antenatal services was experienced as suboptimal, potentially missing the opportunity to provide preventive measures and essential health education intended for both parents. This seemed to contribute to women's disincentive to complete all four recommended visits and men's interest in attending to ensure their partners' reception of care. However, the participants experienced a restriction of men's access during subsequent antenatal visits, which made men feel denied to their increased involvement during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: 'near-miss' women and their partners face paradoxical barriers to actualise the recommended antenatal care visits. The well-intended initiative of male partner involvement counterproductively causes delays or excludes women whereas supportive men are turned away from further health consultations. Currently, the suboptimal quality of antenatal care misses the opportunity to provide health education for the expectant couple or to identify and address early signs of complications IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: these findings suggest a need for increased flexibility in the antenatal care recommendations to encourage women to attend care with or without their partner, and to create open health communication about women's and men's real needs within the context of their social situations. Supportive partners should not be denied involvement at any stage of pregnancy, but should be received only upon consent of the expectant mother.
机译:目的:探讨在怀孕期间几乎死亡的妇女中“产前护理”和伴侣参与的观点和经验。设计:进行了以自然主义探究为指导的研究,其中包括扩展的社区内参与者观察,半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论。定性数据收集于2013年3月至2014年4月在卢旺达基加利。结果:所有被调查者都知道在第一次产前检查中男性参与艾滋病毒检测的建议。但是,该建议被视为拖延链条上的明显联系,并导致了严重后果,特别是对没有订婚伴侣的妇女。产前服务的总体质量被认为是次优的,可能会错过为父母双方提供预防措施和基本健康教育的机会。这似乎助长了妇女对完成所有建议的四次探访的挫败感,并且促使男人有兴趣参加以确保其伴侣得到照料。但是,参与者在随后的产前检查中遇到了男性出入受限的情况,这使男性感到自己在怀孕期间的参与度增加了。结论:“差点错过”的妇女及其伴侣在实现建议的产前检查时面临着自相矛盾的障碍。男性伴侣积极参与的计划适得其反,导致延误工作或将妇女排除在外,而支持男性则不再接受进一步的健康咨询。当前,产前护理质量欠佳,无法为预期的夫妇提供健康教育或发现并解决并发症的早期征兆的机会实践意义:这些发现表明,在产前护理建议中需要增加灵活性以鼓励妇女参加在有或没有伴侣的情况下进行照料,并在其社交场合中就男女的实际需求建立公开的健康交流。在怀孕的任何阶段都不应拒绝支持性伴侣的参与,而应仅在准妈妈的同意下接受支持性伴侣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号